Dream


In class we discussed about science and how one's hunger or even just desire for science can go wrong and be dangerous. We, humans are fragile like "moths" and can easily come and go. What makes us unique is our quest to find and discover more through science and not allowing failure to hinder us. Looking back at our many scientific achievements through history, many people made a lot of sacrifice or even gave up their lives to make, what were once dreams, into a reality. An example is the space race, a "civilian" venture which saw the U.S to be the first and only nation to land a man on the moon. Apollo 11 was the moon landing mission, but there were 5 Apollo missions before that and some were not so good. Apollo 1 killed 3 astronauts: Gus Grissom, Ed White, Roger B Chaffee. President Kennedy's dream was to see the American flag on the moon and NASA had to make it a reality. They started with something simple such as spacecraft docking with the Gemini mission. That had some failures but NASA pushed on and with a lot of effort and money later invested into the Apollo Program America was able to achieve the dream. Just like the radium that glows, the things in the night sky have always fascinated us. The danger of something is seen as a mere challenge and one should make calculated decisions. Chet Raymo is right that one must exercise a level of restraint, because thats how one stays safe, but that should not prevent one from reaching their destination. So now the question is: are we to continue to pursue the unlimited advancement opportunities of science despite the danger and the risk involved, with lives lost and billions of dollars that went along with it? Is it justified to say "we owe our nation and our future generation to further the modern scientific technology "?

Comments

  1. I liked your more in-depth analysis of the message Raymo proposed in his piece. Although we should be more careful with our scientific discoveries, we should not be totally constrained by our precaution and safety. With that in mind, we must figure out how many safety procedures or how much precaution we must take in a certain situation; when does safety become exaggerated or overreacting? I guess we must have a restraint, but that restraint shouldn't restrain our desires.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Nothing ventured, nothing gained. I suppose in the long run, in order to make progress, risks have to be taken. But there is a difference between taking blind risks and taking calculated risks - some unnecessary dangers can be avoided in the quest for betterment.

    ReplyDelete
  3. You end with an important question! I also like how you integrated examples in this.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

You know what really grinds my Gears? Pt2

Milkman's thoughts

Ways to Remember